Member-only story
The Beauty Bias: How Superficial Impressions Shape Political Decisions
In the realm of politics, the allure of a beautiful or handsome face can wield unexpected power, often overshadowing the more substantive aspects of a candidate’s platform and qualifications. Recent elections in Indonesia have underscored this phenomenon, with candidates such as Komeng and Kondang Kusumaning Ayu capturing voters’ attention primarily due to their physical appearance rather than their competence or policies.
This “beauty bias” is a manifestation of cognitive biases deeply ingrained in the human psyche. Known as the halo effect, it describes the tendency for our perception of one positive trait to influence our judgment of other unrelated traits. In the context of politics, the halo effect manifests when voters are swayed by superficial factors like attractiveness, particularly when they are fatigued or overwhelmed by the complexities of analyzing candidates’ platforms.
Human decision-making, as elucidated by author Malcolm Gladwell, often operates on a basis of rapid, intuitive judgments. This tendency to make quick assessments can lead voters to rely on superficial cues, such as facial appearance, as shortcuts for decision-making. However, these snap judgments can lead to decisions that are not necessarily in the best interest of the electorate.
